Alert: CERN To Attempt ‘Big Bang’ In March, Stephen Hawking Issues Warning By The Event Chronicle

Alert: CERN To Attempt ‘Big Bang’ In March, Stephen Hawking Issues Warning

By The Event Chronicle on February 6, 2015 ·

CERN is due to re-open the large hadron collider in March of 2015 in order to recreate the big bang, despite warnings from top scientists such as Stephen Hawking and Neil de Grasse Tyson.

Allnewspipeline.com reports:


Dr. Stephen Hawking recently warned that the reactivation in March of CERN’s large hadron collider could pose grave dangers to our planet…the ultimate reality check we are warned. Hawking has come straight out and said the ‘God particle’ found by CERN “could destroy the universe” leaving time and space collapsed as shared in the 2nd video. Is CERN the most dangerous thing in the cosmos that could lead to the ultimate destruction of the Earth and the entire universe? Recent developments prove to us the scientific community is no longer able to explain ‘reality’ without looking at the ‘supernatural’. Will we soon learn CERN is really the ‘ultimate stargate’ and one of the gate-keepers most closely guarded secrets? Will this be the way man attempts to break the ultimate ‘God barrier’, an attempt to encounter demi-God’s in an all-out rush towards the destruction of all creation? We understand they won’t be releasing the secrets until they’re prepared to release them.


Does CERN headquarter’s symbol of Shiva, dancing the cosmic dance of death and destruction, signal the TRUE purpose of CERN’s existence? A look at the ‘Shiva’ (the Hindu God of Destruction) symbology surrounding CERN’s headquarters gives us the beginning of what we need to know. “The men who would play God, in searching for the God particle, are truly going to find more than they bargained for as they open the gates of hell” we are warned by Stephen Quayle, “they will find inter-dimensional beings who have a taste for human flesh and humanities destruction. Most scientists, in lacking an understanding of the ‘supernatural entities’ that are going to confront them, are way beyond their ability to comprehend, let alone control, the forces of Pandora’s box that will be released.”


Astrophysicist Neil de Grasse Tyson has also sounded the alarm in a hypothetical manner by telling anyone who might want to ‘blow up a planet’ how to do so…is this CERN’s attempt to do so by attempting to ‘recreate’ the big bang within a man made structure that has frightened Stephen Hawking so much? Do they know that they know that they know what they’re doing?


“Ask yourself: how much energy is keeping it together?” Neil deGrasse Tyson told co-host Eugene Mirman on his Star Talk radio show. “Then you put more than that amount of energy into the object. It will explode.”

“In the movie Star Wars, we see the Death Star blow up the planet Alderaan,” Mirman said, reading the question. “Setting aside the question of how [such]a thing would be possible, what would happen to our solar system if the Empire blew up, say, Mars?”

First, deGrasse Tyson said, any Imperial sympathizer looking to make that happen would have to calculate the planet’s binding energy, in order to determine how much energy it would take to overcome the gravitational forces binding the planet together.


“Now you have a device that can pump that energy into your planet and have that planet absorb the energy, rather than have the energy come out the other side, it will completely destroy the planet to smithereens, entirely,” he explained. “So, that’s how one would go about it.”


The 3rd video below is an excellent compilation called “CERN: Supercolliders, Subliminals, & Stargates: Illuminati’s Plan for Satan’s Arrival” while the 4th video is a NOVA documentary on CERN and the final video is from FreedomFighter2127 in which the videographer offers his own evidence and opinions on CERN and its’ tie in to “2015: The International Year of Light”.


CERN to re-create Big Bang after restarting powerful particle accelerator https://www.youtube.com/watch?


Stephen Hawking: God Particle Could Destroy Universe
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJdc3hkcCUc


CERN: Supercolliders, Subliminals, & Stargates: Illuminati's Plan for Satan's Arrival
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=huO8yLcC6hU


Big Bang Machine CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC) - NOVA 2015 Documentary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCoIz7Hx-nI


CERN: Beginnings of this years events start on 2/4/2015 This is the year of Light(Lucifer)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9p4_Vr4luQ

Time Travel is possible says Stephen Hawking

Time Travel is possible says Stephen Hawking

"I do believe in time travel. Time travel to the future. Time flows like a river and it seems as if each of us is carried relentlessly along by time's current. But time is like a river in another way. It flows at diff erent speeds in diff erent places and that is the key to travelling into the future. This idea was first proposed by Albert Einstein over 100 years ago."  ~Stephen Hawking


Needed for assembly: "One wormhole, the Large Hadron Collider, or a rocket that goes really, really fast."


Stephen Hawking thinks for of the world's physicists are wrong believing that time travel is impossible: Hawking sides with Sir Arthur Clarke, author of Space Odyssey 2001 who famously stated that "when a distinguished scientist states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong". And a lot of distinguished scientists believe that just "Time travel is absolutely impossible".


Hawking says: "Although I cannot move and I have to speak through a computer, in my mind I am free. Free to explore the universe and ask the big questions, such as: is time travel possible? Can we open a portal to the past or find a shortcut to the future? Can we ultimately use the laws of nature to become masters of time itself?"


Several of the planet's leading scientists, including Charles Liu (author of "One Universe: At Home In The Cosmos"), Brian Greene (of "The Elegant Universe") and Michio Kaku ("Hyperspace") float a raft of objections to the concept of time travel. True to Clarke's statement, sometimes affectionately known as "Clarke's Law", each objection seems more like reason to expect time travel than rule it out.


Professor Greene states that all time-travel theories operate at the very boundaries of known physics, and are therefore unlikely to work. As opposed to, say, the boundaries of our understanding being where new discoveries are made. As Sir Clarke said years ago: "The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible".


The other chief objection is the incomprehensible amounts of energy required to punch a hole in spacetime, or stabilize a wormhole, or engineer a double-cosmic-string-ring (yes, that's a real astrophysical concept) capable of bending space hard enough to let us pop back to the past. One point eighty-one jigawatts just isn't going to cut it here, whatever "jigawatts" turn out to be, and most calculations show that powering a time machine with a lightning strike would be like powering a sixteen-wheeler with a bag of jelly babies. (So it seems Marty won't be getting back to the future after all). Of course, the idea of lighting up New York would have had you committed to a mental home in the early eighteenth century. Pre-electricity, schemes were being suggested to transport the increasing numbers of people to the scant available heat and light in times of need.


Understand: the amount of energy we now take for granted was so vast, so utterly unimaginable to people in the past that they were preparing to restructure their whole society rather than even attempt to generate it. Of course, this doesn't guarantee that we'll be able to pop back and tell them. The false argument of past scientific ignorance, the "didn't scientists used to think the world was flat" gambit fails because we know so much more now. The key to progress is our cumulative knowledge, developed and refined by generations of researchers into a vast, accurate body of knowledge. We are far more likely to be able to find what's possible than at any point in history. What we know so far is probably right, and allows us to make predictions about what might be possible.


Found: www.dailygalaxy.com

    PRIVACY POLICY
    v. VICTORIA RESURREXIT

© 2014
This is just a tiny slice of Nium

Super-hungry black hole gobbles star at rate previously thought impossible Published time: October 10, 2014 | RT.com

A combined optical/X-ray image of NGC 7793 [Credit: X-ray (NASA/CXC/Univ of Strasbourg/M. Pakull et al); Optical (ESO/VLT/Univ of Strasbourg/M. Pakull et al); H-alpha (NOAO/AURA/NSF/CTIO 1.5m)] with an inset rendering of what P13 would look like close up [Credit: created by Tom Russell (ICRAR) using software created by Rob Hynes (Louisiana State University)].

Super-hungry black hole gobbles star at rate previously thought impossible

Published time: October 10, 2014 20:05

Get short URL

1.7K6573

Tags
Australia, France, Science, Space

An “ultraluminous” black hole P13 in a remote galaxy is consuming a gas cloud belonging to a neighboring star about ten times faster than scientists previously believed was possible.


About 12 million light years from Earth, on the outskirts of the galaxy NGC 7793 the developments around a “luminous” black hole, known as P13, have caught the attention of astronomers.


The scientists were amazed by the speed at which P13 was sucking up a weight that is equivalent to the mass of the moon every three weeks, or the mass of Earth every four years.


P13’s “donor” is a blue supergiant star about 20 times heavier than our Sun.


"It was generally believed the maximum speed at which a black hole could swallow gas and produce light was tightly determined by its size," Dr Roberto Soria, International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research astronomer, said in a press-release. "So it made sense to assume that P13 was bigger than the ordinary, less bright black holes we see in our own galaxy, the Milky Way."


However, the research conducted by Soria, who works at ICRAR's Curtin University in Australia, and his colleagues from the University of Strasbourg, revealed that P13 – being at least a million times brighter than the Sun – was actually quite small. According to Dr Soria, “The black hole must be less than 15 times the mass of our Sun.”


The findings were published in the journal Nature on Thursday.


The star rotating around the black hole sent irregular light due to the proximity of the black hole’s X-ray illumination. "This allowed us to measure the time it takes for the black hole and the donor star to rotate around each other, which is 64 days, and to model the velocity of the two objects and the shape of the orbit," Soria said.

A
A rendering of what P13 would look like close up. Credit: Image created by Tom Russell (ICRAR) using software created by Rob Hynes (Louisiana State University).

P13’s brightness associates it with a “puzzling” group of black holes, discovered in the 1970s – so-called ultraluminous X-ray sources. "These are the champions of competitive gas eating in the Universe, capable of swallowing their donor star in less than a million years, which is a very short time on cosmic scales," he explained.


What struck the scientists most was the fact that ultraluminous X-ray sources are usually intermediate-mass black holes – right between supermassive black holes, that form centers of many galaxies, and stellar-mass black holes, created during the deaths of stars. As it turns out, P13 stands out from this rule, being a stellar-mass black hole that is, nonetheless, unusually bright.


The prominent appetite of P13 made the researcher compare its performance with a Japanese eating champion: "As hotdog-eating legend Takeru Kobayashi famously showed us, size does not always matter in the world of competitive eating and even small black holes can sometimes eat gas at an exceptional rate," as cited by the International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research.


Black holes have long been a major source of interest of scientists – and inspiration of science-fiction writers. But these mysterious cosmic objects seem to have seen their black days recently.


The famous British theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking was first to blow our minds, claiming that “there are no black holes – in the sense of regimes from which light can't escape to infinity”. The denial of the classic definition of a black hole led to calling it a “grey hole” by the media.


But it was only the beginning, as this September an American physicist Laura Mersini-Houghton said that she had found mathematical proof that black holes do not exist in our universe.