https://youtu.be/oqiZfiz2wzo
https://youtu.be/oqiZfiz2wzo
Why would anyone put up with the attacks Q has suffered for a pointless conspiracy?
Thread: https://prayingmedic.com/2020/02/20/qanon-all-for-a-conspiracy/
People & Blogs
Mainstream news outlets publish articles every week claiming to
know Q’s purpose, and yet, each has completely missed the point of Q’s
operation. In order to help you understand Q’s mission, I’d like to
provide a simple analogy.
Imagine a place named Westopia. Imagine that Westopia’s government is
corrupt, but they’ve managed to hide it from the public. Westopia’s
governing body, for example, approves contracts based on bribes that it
receives from contractors. A contract to build a low-income housing
project worth $250 million was awarded to Blue Sky Construction (no
relation to any real company), which paid $25,000 in bribes to key
government officials in exchange for the contract.
Let’s imagine that Westopia has a paid military, and I’m a
high-ranking member who specializes in intelligence. Our military
conducts both foreign and domestic surveillance. The corrupt activities
of politicians have been captured on video and stored on secure servers.
Nothing has been done about corruption because the officials who have
the power to make things right have always gone along with it. Until
now.
Westopia has now elected as its Executive, an outsider who knows
about the corruption but has managed to avoid being involved in it. A
plan was developed to expose these crimes. Because Westopia’s law
enforcement is also involved in corruption, alerting them isn’t a good
option. Instead, a decision was made to make citizens aware of the
corruption and help them take back control of their government.
Westopia has an anonymous internet messaging board that protects the
identity of users, and it’s free of censorship. Rather than disclose
corruption directly, military leaders will inform the public by posting
clues on the message board that, when decoded, will allow citizens to
discover the truth for themselves. We’ve planned out a series of
messages that will be posted over the course of a year. This is our
first message:
Some of us come here to share the truth.
There are dark things going on behind the scenes in Westopia that must be exposed.
The highest levels of government are involved.
Who knows their secrets?
What is a contract?
How are contracts awarded?
Highest bidder?
What is the salary of a public official?
What is the net worth of JP, for example?
Does he own a yacht?
How is that possible?
Sometimes a Blue_Sky foretells a storm.
If you were a citizen of Westopia and you read this message, what
would you think of it? The first few messages posted by the military
would seem irrelevant to most people. But if, as time went on, the
messages continued in the same manner, suggesting that illegal
activities were taking place, more people would take them seriously.
What would happen if photos were posted that hinted at corrupt
activities? What would happen if the insiders answered questions and
provided proof after proof that they had access to highly sensitive
information?
If you understand this illustration, you have some idea of the
purpose of Q’s mission and the way in which it is being carried out.
My research has led me to conclude that Q is, primarily, an
open-source intelligence operation. In our society today, there is
public corruption. Although some people are suspicious that such
corruption exists, the full extent of the corruption and the negative
effect it has on society have been hidden from the public’s
consciousness. Q provides open-source information (intelligence) that
can be used by average people to uncover the truth about it.
Q operates inside a global community of people connected via the
Internet. Each person operates in an area of specialization,
contributing something unique to the community. Lawyers research legal
matters. Graphic designers make memes. Air traffic controllers track
aircraft of interest. Nearly everyone researches the subjects that are
highlighted by Q. Bloggers, podcasters and YouTube broadcasters spread
the information on social media.
Because there are no identified leaders, no memberships, no rules,
and no official narratives, the Q “movement” (if you can call it that)
is an eclectic mix of people who seldom agree on details but choose to
work together to uncover the truth and disseminate it. Each person makes
a contribution when they share the information the community uncovers
with their family, friends, and neighbors. No one’s contribution is
greater or more important than that of another.
If Q were interested in providing a one-way flow of information, he
could simply set up a website and publish his information on it. Q posts
on message boards because he wants a two-way dialogue. He asks
questions of followers and confirms their research or points them in a
different direction when needed. Fine-tuning research is critical to Q’s
mission.
Readers who follow Q are given pointers on various subjects and
encouraged to research and assign meaning to them as they see fit. This
allows each researcher to come to their own conclusions. Once a
conclusion is reached, the meaning becomes personal. A personalized
understanding of a subject leads to diversity of thought among peers.
Each of us emphasizes the things we feel are important, while
diminishing the importance of things someone else might value. With such
diversity of opinion, discussions can become messy. Diversity of
thought is a different dynamic from the groupthink that exists in much
of society today.
Q Can be Difficult To Understand
Many people find Q’s posts perplexing. There are a number of
reasons for that. The first reason is that Q uses a method of
instruction that is rarely used today. In the second half of the 5th
century BC, sophists were lecturers who used philosophy and rhetoric to
entertain, impress, or persuade their audience to accept a point of
view. The Greek philosopher Socrates used a different approach to
teaching. The Socratic method is a form of cooperative argumentative
dialogue between individuals. The alternating asking and answering of
questions is used to force critical thinking, the analysis of ideas, and
the examination of underlying presuppositions. The Socratic method
leads to hypothesis elimination; better hypotheses emerge by steadily
identifying and eliminating weak ones or ones that lead to
contradictions. Typically, a series of questions are introduced that are
intended as tests of logic and fact. These questions help a person
discover their underlying beliefs about some topic and identify beliefs
that should be discarded.
We live in a culture today where reporters write articles and record interviews conveying
their
understanding of a given subject to us. It’s more like a monologue;
there is no debate involved. There is no examination of underlying
beliefs. There is no testing of logic or investigation of the factual
basis of statements. We’re expected to accept the facts as they are
given to us by the presenter without questioning them. The presenter
doesn’t merely tell us “the facts.” They also assign meaning to the
facts. Whoever assigns meaning to information determines the public
narrative on that subject. The media tend to interpret information in a
way that supports an ideological belief system. If you accept a person’s
presentation of facts, you’re more likely to accept their ideological
beliefs.
In contrast to the model of the mainstream media, Q uses the Socratic
method. Using questions, he’ll examine our current beliefs on a given
subject. He’ll ask if our belief is logical, then drop hints about facts
we may not have uncovered, and suggest an alternative hypothesis. He
may provide a link to a news story and encourage us to do more research.
The information we need is publicly available. We’re free to conduct
our research in whatever way we want. We’re also free to interpret the
information however we want. We must come to our own conclusions because
Q keeps his interpretations to a minimum. For many people, researching
for themselves, thinking for themselves, and trusting their own
conclusions can make following Q difficult. When you’re accustomed to
someone telling you what to think, thinking for yourself can be a
painful adjustment.
Although Q has an ideological framework that is centered on freedom
and justice, he provides information in a way that can be interpreted
however one chooses. Indeed, a common criticism of Q is that his
messages don’t impart any real meaning because they can be interpreted
in virtually any way imaginable. The fact that we’re free to interpret
Q’s information however we choose doesn’t mean there are no right or
wrong answers. Q set up a system of communication where researchers can
ask for clues or post the findings of their research and have theories
verified. Many people have received confirmation or help from Q simply
by posting their research on Twitter.
Investigating the clues provided by Q is time-consuming work, but
I’ve found that doing my own research, connecting the dots, and coming
to my own conclusions helps me understand historical and current events
in a more complete way.
https://prayingmedic.com/2020/02/19/what-is-qs-purpose/
This is an excerpt from my book Calm Before the Storm.
