Don't let the cheeky title fool you, this is a rather brilliant summary of the media bias, censorship and control agenda we are currently experiencing, that should scare us all out of complacency. From the Godfather of Inconvenient Truths, David Icke.  ~PB

Thank You Satanic Elite - For Proving Me Right
- David Icke Dot Connector Videocast

•Apr 10, 2020

David Icke

856K subscribers

https://youtu.be/pO57Am75HWc



https://youtu.be/pO57Am75HWc



Our Youtube Sponsor - No Hype Invest - https://www.nohypeinvest.com


Sign up to the brand new Ickonic Media Platform - https://www.ickonic.com


World Tour Tickets - https://shop.davidicke.com/product-ca...


All David's Books Now Available Here https://shop.davidicke.com


Latest News From David Icke - www.davidicke.com


Social Media
https://www.facebook.com/davidicke/ https://twitter.com/davidicke
https://www.minds.com/davidickeofficial
https://onstellar.com/davidickeofficial

Category

Entertainment

12,349 Comments

Add a public comment...(here's mine)
1 minute ago (edited) Thank you, David Icke. You are the Godfather of Inconvenient Truths! Thanks for your body of work and service to humanity. That's a rather sobering but not surprising agenda. I did see the deleted video when it was back up on your website. I've shared a number of 5G articles by groups of scientists, doctors, etc. who have grave concerns about 5G. I keep telling people (who have the audacity to laugh at me) that people have witnessed birds, bats and bees fall from the sky and die when close to 5G transmitters. I tell them if we lose our pollinators, we will have crop failure, famine and civil unrest.

I've been a Truther and Conspiracy Factualist at least since 9/11. While on some social media sites there has always been a Politically Correct slant, I think we all are feeling an increase in other people monitoring and commenting on our behavior, such as invalidating the source of articles and videos we share, and labeling the source (and me for posting it) as a "quack", "conspiracy theorist" (as if that's a bad thing) or just plain "crazy". I am really tired of the MSM-mind-controlled status quo know-it-alls trying to school me, set me straight, demand I "prove" things I refer to (it's your job to educate you, not my job), denigrate me, name-call and dismiss me (because they can't even engage in civil discourse and an exchange of ideas, or when I responded, they couldn't handle my loquacious intelligence and intensity, so they had to tear down anything and anyone I referred to as a source of information.)


Then there was the dog-walker on our main street with narrow sidewalks on a Saturday afternoon back in March, who stopped suddenly to stare at her phone, yanked her dogs aside, then yelled at everyone else for not giving her wide "social distancing" berth, when no one anticipated her abrupt stop, and there was no where to go but out into the busy auto traffic in the street. We are in a district of Boston, MA. We have a lot of trees,a pond, an arboretum and parks nearby. Why walk dogs on a busy narrow street? I took her photo and put it on fb, expressing my contempt for her illogical and rude behavior. My district is generally full of friendly, tolerant, diverse, helpful and kind neighbors. In March, people were laughing as we danced away from each other in passing, feeling almost silly. Now I see the fear and distrust in people's eyes. The Psychopaths are dividing communities with this situation, which is particularly insidious. We must not acquiesce to this fascist control agenda.

When people you don't especially like make valid points....sigh...


As a Truther, I am disappointed in the NY Times, whom most revere, and I have ignored CNN BS for years now, they lie again and again. Listen to this! Please!

I honestly think that Bernie Sanders means well. He was my 1st choice in 2016, but he wasn't on the ballot because the voting at the DNC was rigged. Seth Rich and 2 other IT staffers at the DNC paid for that knowledge with their lives. They knew too much. Seth Rich saw the electronic vote numbers flip from Bernie's to HRC (friends with Google/Alphabet). He put the information in the flash drive that was uploaded and sent to Wikileaks.

-->>>Julian Assange said Russia had nothing to do with the information he received, and that it was impossible for the DNC to have been hacked because the transfer was so fast it could only have been done directly into a flashdrive. <--

This means it was an insider LEAK, not an outsider HACK at the DNC. Wikileaks does not reveal sources, for their protection, but since then we've heard this past year from a journalist who interviewed Seth Rich that it was indeed Seth Rich that did that. He was a supporter of #Bernie so he was a whistle blower and he paid with his life.

So Bernie got burned and now they're trying to do it to Bernie again, invalidate him.
#ThinkForYourself #FakeNews #FakeNYT #FakeCNN #WakeUpAmerica #WalkAway

NYTimes Blatantly Lying About Bernie/Warren Debate

•Jan 16, 2020

The Jimmy Dore Show 

660K subscribers
https://youtu.be/B5X0OReq2IY

Become a Premium Member: http://bit.ly/JDPremium & https://www.patreon.com/jimmydore
Schedule of Live Shows: http://bit.ly/2gRqoyL
Check out our Merch Store: http://bit.ly/tjdsmerch or http://bit.ly/shopTJDS


Full audio version of The Jimmy Dore Show on iTunes: http://bit.ly/tjdshow
Join our community by liking, commenting and sharing to help us reach a wider audience. Keep it positive!


Jimmy Dore on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jimmy_Dore
Ron Placone on Twitter: https://twitter.com/RonPlacone
Stef Zamorano on Twitter: https://twitter.com/miserablelib


Edited by Arno Bolbolian: https://twitter.com/Arneasy
Edited by Koki Miyazaki


About The Jimmy Dore Show: #TheJimmyDoreShow is a hilarious and irreverent take on news, politics and culture featuring Jimmy Dore, a professional stand up comedian, author and podcaster. With over 5 million downloads on iTunes, the show is also broadcast on KPFK stations throughout the country.

Martin Geddes: Understanding #QAnon as the antidote to authority

The Q drops bombard a media-driven battlefield in a narrative cyberwar. Here is how to make sense of them as an advanced form of "information weapon". Web link Subscribe

Understanding #QAnon as the antidote to authority | Martin Geddes We are currently immersed in an unconventional war. Everyone I know senses the intense social and political conflict, unlike any we have experienced before in our lives. Clashing narratives divide families, friends and work colleagues. The war does not yet have an accepted name, but it can be seen as a continuation and culmination of many "hot" and "cold" wars over the past century and more. This war pitches a global Structural Elite (aka the Deep State or The Establishment) against a popular uprising across multiple countries, most notably the USA. A self-sustaining psychopathic culture has covertly ruled over the populace via criminal control of banking, media, government, academia, industry, religion, and the military. It involves mafia-like families, secret societies and extensive hoarding of information. We are being gradually exposed to some of this dark power system's mechanisms: blackmail centres like Epstein Island, pay-for-play networks such as with the Clintons and Bidens, sexual slavery with groups like NXIVM, and (if you've been paying attention) even baby farms. Add in human trafficking, imported militias and lots of very powerful paedophiles. It's stomach churning and treacherous stuff, and much worse is to come. The most potent of these corrupt social control systems is the corporate mass media. Q is the "antidote" military operation, designed to break their narrative-setting power permanently. I have previously described this Q phenomenon at the highest level with my essay WWG1WGA — The Greatest Communication Event in History, which introduces the catch-22 that Q constructs for the #FakeNews. I later unpacked this analysis with The 4 Functions of Q. The last of these functions is Q as an "information weapon against institutionalised crime and corrupted media". Let me expand a little on how I see Q as a weapon on a complex information battlefield. By the end of this article, I hope you will have a clearer "lens" through which to make sense of mainstream coverage of #QAnon. (A quick aside for the new and confused: the "Q team" produces the information "drops" now on 8kun.net; "QAnons" are ordinary, anonymous people on such social media websites; "#QAnon" is the media-friendly hashtag often used in headlines to represent the movement as a whole.) What we are being asked to do via Q is to reconsider at a fundamental level what "information" is in the context of world affairs. This involves a paradigm shift from the "authoritative news" model of the corporate media to the "sauced bread" model of social media sites like 4chan and 8kun. Let's first examine the familiar process of getting our "daily news-fix" via TV, radio and the press. The corporate media is heavily branded — think BBC, CNN, Reuters — and is run by professional journalists. They seek data from public and insider sources, produce and edit their work in private, and then (for print media) present their insights and opinions under their own byline. Mainstream journalists depend on the distribution power of their publications or programmes to get them an audience. Central to this distribution model is the authority of the brand. You are invited to believe what you read or hear, even if sources are anonymous and writers unknown to you, because the brand is a trusted authority. So a New York Times opinion piece is seen as having more authority to identical words from the same author published on a personal blog. Most journalists are reasonably honest and honourable, for sure. But it only takes (blackmail and extortion) control over a few proprietors, editors, and hiring managers to effectively have control over the medium itself. The claim of many of us is that there is an "attack surface" against the mass media — and that it has been extensively exploited by highly sophisticated criminals. As such, the appearance of authority is being used to further corrupt ends and cover for organised crime. This is where #QAnon comes in as an information weapon. It is an unprecedented challenge to the foundation of public trust and belief in the mass media. The mass media is forced to position #QAnon as a rival "authority" source, and one which is hilariously lacking in brand credibility. That is because under no circumstances must the corporate media allow the audience to reconsider whether "authority" is a helpful pointer to truth. The mainstream media (MSM) audience has outsourced their power to think for themselves to external authority — and this authority is gaslighting and exploiting them. If they realise the seriousness of the betrayal, then it is "game over" for the #FakeNews. Let me say that again, more slowly. The mainstream media positions #QAnon as a thing you "believe in", or are a "follower of", like some kind of New Age spiritual cult. Those who "follow Q" are depicted as mindless morons, not critical thinkers. Their data, arguments and insights are accepted and dismissed as a collective, not as free-thinking individuals. This is because the corporate media's claim to legitimacy is founded upon you believing they solely have authority to define 'reality', so you should (uncritically) believe them. In particular, when they speak with one voice you presume that there must be an underlying truth, because you do no see the coordination mechanism. They appear to be multiple independent sources, but are in fact controlled by corrupt intelligence agencies. This is the cruel mass mind control trick that is being perpetrated against the public. From the MSM's perspective, #QAnon is an unbranded, unprofessional, unsourced set of text and image posts on an exotic and unruly social media site. In their paradigm it has zero authority — so you should not believe any of it. Indeed, it's so patently absurd that anyone could treat such a thing seriously, you shouldn't even entertain the idea of going there and looking at the raw data for yourself. Of course, the reality is they know Q is an existential threat; but to ignore Q raises questions, and they are only left with feeble hit pieces on #QAnon to maintain the illusion of authority. The "authority" model extends to the big social media platforms, too. They are also in the business of only allowing you to promote the "official narrative" — not challenging it. As this Newstarget article on censorship notes (my emphasis): Big Tech’s excuse for engaging in this mass censorship agenda is that it is somehow necessary in order to promote “authoritative information.” But as Adams explains, “authoritative information” is simply a fancy misnomer to categorize deep state propaganda. When you (unconsciously) buy into the current "authority" media model, you will continue to accept whatever lies and propaganda that the mass media pushes your way, and you will reject alternative data like Q because it lacks the authority you (wrongly) believe is a proxy for truth. This is the trap we see many of those dear to us struggling to escape: incredulity stops them seeing the coordinated propaganda reality. It's hardly surprising when the MSM won't help you by showing you how to read Q drops, or pointing you at the most interesting parts. Because… guess what? The information in these "drops" comprises the most explosive political scandals in history, including their own complicity in serious criminality! "Q followers" have been watching these scandals slowly unfold for the last two years, waiting for the hammer to finally fall on the crowds of crooks. Q drops have often foreshadowed events in a way only a plan with military precision could account for. It looks like the fun is about to really get going with Spygate/FISAgate, with the Clinton Foundation in the spring/summer. By allowing someone else to tell you what to think you have ceded your own authority. The mainstream news is 6-18 months behind understanding of events of "Q followers". There's a real cost to pay of being "out of touch" — yet seemingly having the comfort of the crowd. The Q drops are constructed to initially appeal to those who are the most skeptical and open minded, and thus have the least utility for "authority" as a short cut to veracity. In other words, the QAnon project has created a nucleus community of critical thinkers, around which the public can assemble to reclaim the authority to decide for themselves. It's as if the diseased Official Narrative "hive mind" is having a new "hive" built next to it, and Q is the Queen bee of this cleansed new narrative environment. There's no precedent in history for this happening that I know of, although there are many "narrative collapses" like the end of the USSR. Q is core to a new citizen media that usurps the untrustworthy mass media as their brand-authority model collapses. This is not about citizens working as unpaid journalists, replicating the existing corporate media model. We are not offering ourselves as a more authoritative and trustworthy kind of news operation per se. Citizen media happens when citizens accept that the only acceptable authority is themselves. The model of the "chans" (where Q lives) is a template for how collaborative investigative journalism can be produced. It is a very different paradigm. Collective data "crumbs" with "sauce" (i.e. hard evidence, not opinion) are openly assembled by volunteers into the "bread" and "buns" by "bakers". Rather than news bulletins there are "notables" summaries capturing the most interesting threads. Nobody tells you what to think. It's the opposite for corporate journalism: an open process, stripped of personal and institutional branding. There is no authority tied to individuals or corporate logos. The data that emerges from that process, as well as parallel endeavours on Twitter and elsewhere, then feeds into a new distribution system: ordinary people have "hijacked" social media for citizen journalism to bypass the controlled mass media. We're only as authoritative as our personal reputations or (where necessary) pseudonyms. You don't have to believe anything I say, but I reckon you'd be dumb to accept the word of a NYT journalist over mine because of their brand. In this paradigm, a New York Times opinion piece arguably has less authority to identical words from the same author published on a personal blog. The very idea of "authority from corporate being" is discredited. We citizen journalists are such a threat to the established order that these social media platforms are being forced to expose themselves as censorship engines. For example, Twitter won't let me add any followers right now: their behaviour is obviously fraudulent. What was set up to be a surveillance and censorship system has been turned back upon its criminal creators (and have no illusions, companies like Twitter, Amazon, Facebook, and Google have a LOT of nasty legal problems ahead). This is also why the idea of Q as a "Qult" is laughable: the only demand that Q places upon us is to think for ourselves. There are no mandatory doctrines, no membership list. It's the perfected antithesis of a cult, which demands unquestioning belief in an authority, with coercive penalties for apostasy. I was going to delve into the detail of the specific mechanisms by which Q deconstructs belief in institutional authority, and replaces it with sovereign person authority. Plausible deniability and information osmosis will have to wait for another day. If you take one thing away from this Sunday evening essay it is this: you cannot simultaneously believe in the authority of media brands to tell you what to think — and also be truly thinking for yourself. It's one or the other: make your choice wisely. (I'm with Q and the critical thinkers.) Share Tweet Share Forward I donate all my time and professional expertise to MAGA for free. If you value open source citizen journalism, then please be a patron for its creators, including myself. A "service to all" ethos means making a fair exchange. URL to share for signing up to this free newsletter: http://eepurl.com/dSkfz Recent back issues are here. Join over 79,000 other people and follow me on Twitter. Click to read my three most popular "red pill" articles. I always append a beautiful thing, as beauty unites us in our divided world. See more of my work and sign up to my art mailing list at martingeddes.photography. Christmas shoppers outside the Microsoft store, Oxford Circus, London.

I am taking a break from offering telecoms consulting services to focus on other projects. But you can still read more about me at martingedd.es. I am still open to interesting offers of collaboration. Copyright © 2019 Martin Geddes Consulting Ltd, All rights reserved.https://mailchi.mp/martingeddes/understanding-qanon-as-the-antidote-to-authority?

Praying Medic: Qanon July 17 2019 - Think For Yourself

Qanon July 17 2019 - Think For Yourself

prayingmedic

Published on Jul 17, 2019

https://youtu.be/dZj6ZuCAsvw


Amid accusations that President Trump is a racist, Qanon encourages us to think for ourselves.


Twitter thread: http://bit.ly/Q_Think-


This broadcast covers post #3436-3437 on https://qmap.pub/


My website: https://prayingmedic.com/