Amidst the hysteria, Praying Medic lends a voice of sanity and explains why we need not fear WWIII... ~PB
I’ve written previous articles (here and here) about President Trump’s approach to military interventions in the Middle East. After several key Iranian military leaders were killed last night, some are wondering if we’re looking at a protracted war with Iran. I do not think that’s a likely scenario. Let me explain why.
Donald Trump was elected on a foreign policy of “peace through strength”—a motto he borrowed from Ronald Reagan. Reagan realized that the key to ending the Cold War was displaying sufficient military strength and the will to use it in a way that would cause the Soviet Union to fold. Reagan’s strategy worked. He avoided a nuclear exchange by a demonstration of strength.
Barack Obama counseled Trump prior to his inauguration, saying the most difficult challenge he would face was avoiding war with North Korea. Trump asked Obama if he had talked with Chairman Kim. Obama said he had not because Kim was a dictator. Trump was astounded that Obama never even tried to speak with Kim. He called Obama’s policy “stupid.”
Trump opened communications with Kim, likely through a backchannel and also on Twitter. Trump’s tweets were perceived by many as foolish.
In this tweet, POTUS taunted Kim about his ‘nuclear button”
Pundits
insisted Trump’s insults and taunting would only lead to further
hostility, and possibly, war. But Trump had applied heavy economic
sanctions to North Korea which were making life difficult for Kim.
Although Obama had never even
tried to negotiate peace with North Korea, in June of 2018, Trump met
with Kim in Singapore to discuss denuclearization. Trump’s tactics may
be unconventional, but they get results.
During his bid for the White
House, Trump blasted previous Presidents for the wars they had started.
During his first two years in office, Trump allowed military leaders to
run their game plan, but when it was clear they had no intention of
leaving Afghanistan or Syria, he made personnel changes and announced
that our troops would be coming home. Trump has signaled to everyone who
will listen, his intent to get us out of the endless wars in Asia and
the Middle East.
This philosophy applies to Iran,
but Iran presents a unique set of problems. The Obama administration
entered into the disastrous Iran deal, which allowed Iran to develop
nuclear weapons covertly. (Benjamin Netanyahu exposed Iran’s secret weapons program in April of 2018).
Iran wages violence in the region
via the use of proxies. Initial reports on the missile attack on a Saudi
oil field in September did not connect it to Iran, but evidence later showed
it was an Iranian-backed operation. The attack on the U.S. Embassy in
Baghdad was initially reported as not being connected to Iran, but
later, the State Department said it had proof that those who attacked
the embassy were an Iranian proxy group. Iran’s
highest-ranking military leader, Qassem Soleimani was killed in an
airstrike at Baghdad International Airport last night. If Iran was not
behind the recent attack on the U.S. embassy, what was Soleimani doing
in Baghdad?
To maintain a strategic advantage
over his opponents, Donald Trump does not reveal his plans in advance,
but he will signal his intentions to people to pose a threat.
Barack Obama threatened Bashar al-Assad with a “red line in the sand”
over the use of chemical weapons. When chemical weapons were used, and
Obama did nothing, it signaled to Iran and every other rogue nation that
Obama was a paper tiger who would not hold them accountable for acts of
violence.
Trump’s personal decision to order the airstrike on Iran’s highest
military leader signaled to Iran (and other rogue leaders) that if they
believe they can continue using acts of terror against the U.S and its
allies there will be painful consequences. That’s what it looks like
when the “strength” component of a “peace through strength” foreign
policy is applied in real life.
President Trump has demonstrated no interest in starting another war.
He knows the Iranian people are being held captive by corrupt political
leaders but regime change is not a primary objective. His primary goal
is a negotiated peace agreement. The use of economic sanctions are
intended to break the will of Iran’s leaders and cause them to agree to
peace talks.
If Iran’s leaders act foolishly and take military action against the
U.S. we should expect a swift response from President Trump. Militarily,
Iran is no match for the U.S. and Iran has few allies. Most nations in
the region are friendly to the U.S. including Israel and Saudi Arabia.
Russia might be expected to help Iran, but Putin may see them as a
liability and refrain from becoming involved. NATO would have little
choice but to support the U.S. I would expect any military intervention
in Iran to be over quickly.
Please pray for President Trump and his team to have the wisdom to
negotiate these events with godly wisdom and for peace to finally come
to the Middle East.
(Visited 7,760 time, 1,652 visit today)
https://prayingmedic.com/2020/01/03/trump-iran-top-military-leader-what-next/