Republishing as much background material pertains to this prior post
Discernment
https://seerseekersayersage.blogspot.com/2020/02/discernment.html
----
A MUST-listen if you are confused and/or alarmed by the political theatre of our times, and are not a conspiracy theorist! I made a partial transcript. In the longer video, Bill Wood gives details of his military service and duties as a Navy Seal with Above Top Secret clearance, 9/11 intel that preceded that day, and evaluation of the event. These guys who serve certainly pay their dues, in one way or another. He also explains about the Looking Glass technology, and how and why it was used and later shut down. Mind-blowing, if you understand the concepts, and he breaks it down pretty clearly! The shorter video is the last part that pertains to current "end times" and what is playing out geopolitically, as predicted it would, after the timeline convergence in 2012. ~PB.
.
.
My tags: Ascension, Bill Wood, Cabals + Conspiracies, Disclosure, Kerry Cassidy, Military Insider, Navy Seal, Project Camelot, Interview, Project Looking Glass, Shadow Government, 9/11, White Hats/Oathkeepers, Whistleblower, Area 51, "Loose Change", Timelines,
.
.
PROJECT LOOKING GLASS DESCRIBED BY MILITARY INSIDER, ex-Navy Seal Bill Wood:
(Transcript from last 1/3 of this first interview; the 3 interviews are a.k.a. "The Bill Wood Disclosures" )
.
.
.
"...The biggest cherry on top of all this conversation, would be a synopses to say, that if I could convince everybody out there, that for all intents and purposes, what we believe to be true, eventually becomes true. If somebody convinces us that a major disaster is going to happen in the very near future, a major disaster happens in the very near future. If we don't buy in to that fear, and accept that there's really nothing that we know is going to happen, and accept that, whatever happens, that makes the convergence of the timelines happen as naturally as possible.... and the attempts to try to go away from this one inevitable conclusion....I again, see as a new beginning, an end of this reality, and the beginning of something that we can't even possibly understand, based on the level of our beliefs currently, but when all that information comes flooding out, there is going to be no denying what's true and what's a lie or what's illusion.
We won't have the choice to believe that 911 happened because of a bunch of terrorists, because we'll know exactly what's happened.
Basically, what we're experiencing right now is two master chess players sitting at the board, and one of them looks down at the board and sees that he's in checkmate in 7 minutes, and he looks across it at his opponent and he knows that his opponent sees it, too. So there's no getting out of it. So at this point, the loser can only prolong the game...the game... both players know the game is over. It's only a matter of time before he does this, and then you're forced to do this, and then hes forced to do this, and eventually checkmate.
We as a race, if we could understand that the game is over...that based on the rules of the game the bad guys have already lost... the good guys have already won. Yes, there's moves left on the table, but those moves are being forced by the player that is going to win.
The only way the checkmate can't happen is if the player that's winning makes a mistake. But from all the information that I have gathered, all of the information that's been given, all the information that's been vetted to me, it seems pretty obvious that the good guy player on this side of the chessboard knows exactly what has to be done to win the game... and so, at this point, any mistake would be all but impossible.
But again, you really have to understand the game to know that the guy that's losing has lost... and I'm sure most people sitting watching the chess match between 2 advanced chess players know the games over long after the 2 players know it's over.. because they can't see the board and see that there's only 7 moves left.
Now let me say why I believe that it comes down to one inevitability, is because I was entrusted in getting it down to two possibilities.. and I've heard both of those possibilities talked about in massive proportions, the good and the bad.
To most easily put it to people, one scenario is what most people would understand to be Ascension, or an evolution of consciousness that brings us out of the cocoon and turns us into a butterfly. Timeline Two is some kind of major global catastrophe that drives most of us underground, and leaves a few of us on top to fend for ourselves...
But I would also like to point it out, that what they called timeline two, "Timeline Two". It seemed very odd to me that even back then, it was identified as NOT one, and that "ONE" didn't get talked about."
.
.
-Bill Wood
.
.
-----------------‐‐-----‐‐--‐‐-‐
BlueEyes @AbbeyMaeCook88 · 4h
#QAnon Project Looking Glass It all makes sense!
.
.
667 subscribers
.
.
3.05K subscribers
You can watch the rest of the interview here and below:
I just trimmed it down to get to the part it explains everything QAnon has been pointing us to.
Literally they cant stop what is coming. its impossible!!!
.
.
.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
Topic
Posted by Bob07
on February 19, 2012 - 6:39am (includes embedded video links)
Kerry
Cassidy conducted her first two interview with Bill Wood in an
uncharacteristically restrained and "allowing" style, but that has now
devolved into epic nastiness, which is worth wondering about.
I'm not stating any opinion about the article below (which originally appears here (link is external)). I have no way of knowing where the truth lies, but have only gut feelings.
If you want some background on this fallout, watch the very good Lisa Harrison-Bill Wood interview (link is external)
that is referred to below. I did not listen to the Cassidy radio
interview (the third one) where allegedly the noxious waste matter hit
the revolving paddles, but having heard about it, I don't really want
to. ...However, based on this report and my former impressions of
Cassidy, I do wonder whether she has a serious personality disorder. At
the very least, the writer of the article does bring up some
perspectives on Camelot (and Avalon) that may be worth thinking about.
Here we go...
Tuesday, February 14, 2012 at 11:06PM
Related: Shootout At the Camelot Corral-February 10, 2012 (link is external)
The Bill Wood Disclosures:
I have now gone through nearly 12 hours of the audio, and the video
of the first interview, with Bill Wood from Project Camelot...some of
these twice! I have witheld any substanitive judgements of the level of
information provided in those interviews, but have commented on the
hubris surrounding the "Beyond Looking Glass" marketing campaign
launched by Camelot to feature the interviews on their site.
Even as the videos went viral, it was clear that Kerry Cassidy was
unhappy with Bill's performance, so much so that David Wilcock was
brought in to shore up the shaky foundations. The problem lies, not in
the information Bill Wood provided, but in what was EXPECTED by both the
collective of Project Camelot and the audience. Forget for now, the
accusations that Brockbrader/Wood was not a SEAL and that he is a
registered sex offender...those issues are dealt with effectively on
both sides. Forget that when the third Camelot video became an expose of
sex rings in Las vegas and a platform for Bill's spiritual pursuit,
Wood was "lynched" via chatroom comments. As I said, I have refrained
from any comments until I have spoken with Bill Wood, personally.
What IS clear is that Bill Wood failed to provide the level of "sizzle" required for a whistleblower on Project Camelot. So,
Wood was thrown under the bus by Cassidy (link is external) because he failed to live up to the hype
promised by Camelot, who of late have a shortfall of new dislosers.
Cassidy's pale "love and light" veneer gave way to outright denunciation
after Wood issued some corrections is his subsequent interview with
Lisa Harrison (link is external) on February 7, 2012.
In an email to which I was a recipient, Bill attached a lenghty
statement dealing with both substanitive issues and the heightening war
of words with Kerry Cassidy. The full statement is posted below as a
PDF. What follows is Kerry's reply, and my commments to her recent
actions, focusing on her repeated undermining of people with which she
has conflict, by invoking a "mind control" epithet.
More Truth Revealed by Bill Brockbrader.pdf (link is external)
UNDERSTAND THIS:
Mind control, "programming" and other similar terms are
MEMES...repeated and regurgitated throughout the internet media, removed
from their context. They also act as TRIGGERS for both the victims,
and those distinctive varieties of trolls who habituate forums, talk
show chatrooms, and blog comments.
The act of bandying these terms around in loose fashion, especially
as a means of discrediting a subject is nothing less than a form of mental hate crime!
Like racial epithets, gender-based slurs, or derogatory comments on
the disabled, the usage of "mind control" and its associated terms as
an implied negative character disorder, desensitizes the public
perception of these hideous practices, and minimizes the trauma of its
victims in favor of a broader, more pragmatic usage to the detriment of
everyone who works to END FOREVER these practices.
As I outline below, if Ms. Cassidy wishes to denounce Bill Wood as a
"liar", that is her perogative. The term is fairly clear, and perhaps
applicable where two parties vary on details. Lies can be addressed in a
substantive manner by the readers and listeners with the proper degree
of discernment...the world if FULL of liars.
On the other hand, mind control must be understood as a syndrome of violence to the human soul and psyche. In
extremis,
it is a violent, brutal, and devastating process that strips the
subjects abilities to recall or assess their own thoughts and actions.
Mind control subjects are VICTIMS...not liars, in the capacity of their
particular testimony. Anyone who has ever spent time interviewing
subjects of mind control (including abductees), fully knows the
precarious nature of both the psyche and the testimony being given.
These factors make any such interview a matter of delicacy and great
sensitivity. That sensitivity must never be over-ridden by the
subjective whims of the interviewer, or audience, regarding the
subjects' moral intentions. To be more succinct: lies are
purposeful distortions; mind control is a subjegation of willful
response and action. The two are not morally equal, and the latter is
involuntary.
As a publicly denounced "liar", Bill Wood should have slunk away. He
did not do so, and in fact, roared back with a level statement on the
differences with Camelot, the war of words with Navy SEAL, Don Shipley,
and an offer of validation by a former SEAL trainer who recalled both Wood and
Blackwater founder,
Erik Prince.
Cassidy, understandably upset (but with no small blame to bear due to
her ungraceful handling of the entire Bill Wood debacle), shot back
with one phrase that once again demonstrated a lack of integrity as regards the subject of MIND CONTROL:
Bill,
More lies from you. Obviously you are re-programmed and no longer trustworthy in any way.
Please do not attempt to contact me or send me further lies regarding me or Camelot.
Thank you.
Kerry
For those who are not familiar with Cassidy's prior attempts to
smear someone with the "mind control" label I refer you to the article
here:
Letter To Kerry Cassidy-December 5, 2011 (link is external) What follows is my response to Cassidy's latest drive-by mind control attack:
Randy Maugans
Feb 13
to KERRY, Bill, ...
We have Bill's written statement, and Kerry's blog article, we are
all grown-ups, let those with ears hear. I have an issue with Kerry---a
pattern if you will, that persists: whenever someone turns on her, or
those on the INSIDE of Project Camelot, she reverts to accusations of
mind control, as she does in both her posts and this email regarding
Bill Wood. She did this in the accusations made against Richard Hoagland
by Gary Vierre back in December 2011, when she wrote that Gary was
likely a mind control subject.
I would have to ask you, Kerry, what substantive evidence do you
have that Bill has been "re-programmed"? What evidence did you ever have
about your cruel accusations against Gary---a person with which you
had NO contact?
You may ask why this matters?
Again, it goes to the very core of the work you and Bill did in
Project Camelot's early days with whistleblowers who were generally
assumed to be both handled, and subjects of some form of mind control.
You have had witnesses who acknowledge they are being handled...Barry
King comes to mind, as he told me directly he is still handled.
The problem is one of deploying convenient pejorative labels whenever
things turn to shit on your end. So I ask: is being a "mind control"
subject a descriptor of a person who is to be treated with compassion,
or derision? I don't think you can have it both ways. If you choose the
negative connotation (and you have), then you place into disrepute not
only those you have so labelled, but your own "body of evidence", and
any such future endeavors.
That those coming out of such projects are subject to surveillance,
handling (direct or indirect), and even ultimately being "switched"
should not come as a surprise to you, a veteran researcher of these
subjects. That you have a repeated pattern of such behavior demonstrates
either a double standard towards such subjects, or a naïveté beyond
your experience.
It appears this is your last resort epithet when all else has failed.
In a sense, you, being a researcher of mind control, employ mind
control by invoking mind control---even where a lack of such is absent.
You wonder why your whistleblowers are drying up? Do you not sense that
even your own audience is growing fatigued with your sharp elbows and
tactless manner in attempting to pry the last ounce of substance from
your victims (er, interview subjects)?
I think you have fairly stated that Bill's testimony was not in line with your standards in this statement:
"...a lack of familiarity with what Project Camelot is all about. And
therefore Bill and Eva are not able to assess accurately what is new
and what is well known to the Camelot audience."
You also seemed to evoke the proper tenor for a person in your field when you wrote:
"I suggest that rather than judging him you consider the impact that
simple mass mind control has had on your own lives and then try to put
yourself in the shoes of someone who has that and on top of it joins
the military and becomes the focus of intense mind manipulation over
long periods of time. Then you will begin to understand what it truly
means to be a whistleblower, or someone who has chosen to break ranks
and come forward to tell the truth about what they have experienced."
That was then, this is now. So there are double standards, or what we would call "conditional love"....nice!
In your haste to rush out the Bill Wood material, did you ever vet
his testimony? Did it occur to you that the fact he presented material
similar to other whistelblowers was to be considered more
"corroborative" than the stunning next big thing that your (perceived)
adrenaline-addicted listenership demands? Part of the art of media is
knowing how to frame things, and present in a manner appropriate to the
presenter. When the first interview failed to yield the appropriate
"buzz", did you really need three people to handle a second
interview...or is this just Camelot's manner of "handling" a subject?
Kerry, you have a problem: you are completely disingenuous about mind
control. IF...I repeat...IF, Bill has been "reprogrammed", then he
would not be the culprit, but those who are his handlers. On the other
hand, if "mind controlled" "reprogrammed", or other similar terms are to
be bandied about in hostility and anger, then it can be presumed you
lack the appropriate insight and sensitivity to work with such people.
I suspect those who have watched these repeated "blow ups",
especially witnesses presently not coming forward, are also seeing the
big picture in this regard. I suggest you clarify your perceptions and
responses with an attunement of sensitivity toward subjects of mind
control programs, and resist taking (once again) the "low road" when
things go bad.
Grace under pressure is the real sign of a professional...not the
name-calling and hurled implications which you cannot know or prove.
Randy Maugans-OffPlanet Radio (link is external)
In his written article,
Bill Wood proposes a serious solution to the constant churning of
"information" at Camelot, and one I support: an alternative to the
white knuckle atmosphere of Project Camelot-type forums:
"I would only suggest that, as Kerry states, that
Project Camelot is not the proper forum for first time whistleblowers
and that many people, including myself, agree with her statement. It is
my greatest wish to establish a forum in which whistleblowers can
disclose seeming unbelievable information and not be discredited simply
because they don’t possess a level of proof that nameless, faceless
people in the chatrooms and forums
demand."
I get a steady flow of emails form listeners and readers who voice
concerns over the goings on at Camelot/Avalon, usually of the type that
indicates they feel captive to the millieu of such turmoil. YOU HAVE A
CHOICE: Dump them and begin to dig out the truth for yourselves!
Camelot may be the "big dog" (for now) of truther-type media, but they
are certainly not the only one.
In fact, be suspicious of "big dogs"---they are usually "well fed",
if you catch the drift. Certainly, the tone of arrogance indicates that
Kerry & Co. feel justified in deploying the mind control meme to
their advantage whenever it suits them. That arrogance worries me...how
about you?
----
[More comments and the discussion branched out to discuss but consciousness and Terrence McKenna.]
http://www.gatheringspot.net/topic/general-discussion/update-bill-woods-mututal-fallout-project-camelot
