Bombshell: CNBC Anchor says Building 7 a 'Controlled Implosion'

Sharing this email, as requested. ~PB


Hi Friends,

I hope you are sitting down when you watch the video below, because it is going to blow your mind!

And don’t you wonder why this is not “Front Page News” in every USA paper?!

Patience, Persistence and Solidarity,
Chris

Christopher Gruener MA, LMHC
Secretary for Boston 9/11 Truth www.Boston911Truth.org
New England and Northeast US Region 9/11 Truth Action Project Coordinator www.911TAP.org  and www.facebook.com/911TAP 

My Personal Political Website: http://imaginepeaceandplenty.com
My Professional Website: www.crossroads-counseling-services.com
617-965-6552

From: actionalert=ae911truth.org@mail.salsalabs.net [mailto:actionalert=ae911truth.org@mail.salsalabs.net]
On Behalf Of AE911Truth
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 7:56 PM
To: imaginepeaceandplenty@gmail.com
Subject: Bombshell: CNBC Anchor says Building 7 a 'Controlled Implosion'

CNBC Anchor Ron Insana:
Building 7 a ‘Controlled Implosion’



Insana’s story suggests he was told of Building 7’s demolition

On the 18th anniversary of 9/11, CNBC senior analyst and former anchor Ron Insana went on Bernie and Sid In the Morning on New York’s 77 WABC Radio to share his
haunting experience of that horrible day.

Approximately eight minutes into the interview,
Insana made a statement regarding the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7
— which collapsed late in the afternoon of 9/11 — that is truly stunning, especially considering his access to the scene and his job as a prominent news anchor. . .

READ THE ARTICLE

 

 

 

 

CNBC Anchor Ron Insana: Building 7 a ‘Controlled Implosion’

Ted Walter

September 25, 2019

On the 18th anniversary of 9/11, CNBC senior analyst and former anchor Ron Insana went on Bernie and Sid In the Morning on New York’s 77 WABC Radio to share his haunting experience of that horrible day.


Approximately eight minutes into the interview, Insana made a statement regarding the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7 — which collapsed late in the afternoon of 9/11 — that is truly stunning, especially considering his access to the scene and his job as a prominent news anchor:


“Well, remember 7 World Trade had not yet come down. And so when I went down to the [New York Stock] Exchange that Wednesday morning [September 12], I was standing with some military and police officers, and we were looking over in that direction. And if it had come down in the way in which it was tilting, it would have wiped out everything from where it stood to Trinity Church to the Exchange to, effectively, you know, the mouth of the Hudson. And so there were still fears that if that building had fallen sideways, you were going to wipe out a good part of Lower Manhattan. So they did manage for one to take that down in a controlled implosion later on. And the Exchange was up and running the following Monday.” [Emphasis added.]


Before addressing questions about Insana’s timeline, let us establish the aspects of his story that are clear and unambiguous. First, he clearly identifies Building 7 as the building he is talking about. Second, he clearly states that Building 7 was taken down in a “controlled implosion,” which flatly contradicts the official explanation that it collapsed due to office fires.

 

On the 18th anniversary of 9/11, CNBC senior analyst and former anchor Ron Insana went on Bernie and Sid In the Morning on New York’s 77 WABC Radio to share his haunting experience of that horrible day.


Insana’s matter-of-fact remark is particularly significant because the manner in which he delivers it and the context in which he came to believe that Building 7 was brought down in a "controlled implosion" suggest that he was told this information and that it may have been fairly common knowledge at the scene. (The only other possibility is that he deduced it was a “controlled implosion” based on his own observation of it.) Indeed, Insana is not the only person to report that a demolition of Building 7 was being considered or was imminent.


For instance, FDNY Lieutenant David Restuccio told MSNBC’s Brian Williams just minutes after the collapse: “We had heard reports that the building was unstable and that eventually it would either come down on its own or it would be taken down.”


Another is volunteer EMT Indira Singh, who, in 2005, told radio host Bonnie Faulkner: “All I can attest to is that by noon or one o’clock they told us we had to move from that triage site up to Pace University a little further away because Building 7 was going to come down or being brought down.” Faulker replied, “Did they actually use the word ‘brought down,’ and who was it that was telling you this?” “The fire department, the fire department,” Singh answered. “And they did use the word ‘we’re going to have to bring it down.’”


Then there are the unidentified construction workers and law enforcement officers captured on video just moments before the collapse, saying: “You hear that?” “Keep your eye on that building. It’ll be coming down.” “The building is about to blow up, move it back.” “We are walking back. There’s a building about to blow up. Flame, debris coming down.”


Insana’s statement is all the more remarkable because it appears that he is unaware of the debunked official story of Building 7’s collapse — according to which office fires leveled a skyscraper for the first time in history — and of the controversy that this story has caused over the past 18 years. Insana might be surprised to learn that there is controversy at all, given what he appears to have been told during his reporting and given the manner in which Building 7 came down — namely, that of a perfectly executed controlled demolition.





Ron Insana, covered in pulverized concrete from the explosive demolition of the Twin Towers earlier that morning, reports from NBC’s studios on September 11, 2001.


Now for the confusing aspects of Insana’s timeline. Building 7 collapsed at 5:20 PM on Tuesday, September 11, 2001. He says he went down to the Financial District on the morning of Wednesday, September 12, where he looked in the direction of Building 7.


There appear to be three ways to make sense of what he said (assuming he is speaking honestly, which there seems little reason to doubt).


One, when he talks about looking in the direction of Building 7, he could mean that he was looking at the debris pile of Building 7, which had already been brought down neatly into its own footprint. In this scenario, he and others were inferring that if the building had tipped over instead of having been brought down, which had already occurred, it would have done significant damage to the surrounding area.


Two, he may have gone down to the Financial District and had the conversation he describes before 5:20 PM on September 11, rather than on September 12. This scenario seems the least likely, though, because he is very specific about not going back down to the stock exchange until September 12, having already made his way up from the scene to NBC’s midtown headquarters by midday on September 11. (Insana’s first appearance in the studio on September 11 was around 12:41 PM, when he vividly described how the first tower had “started to explode.”)


Three, he may have observed the damage to Building 7 or somehow learned about it on September 11, but he is incorrectly placing that observation or the receipt of that information within his experiences on September 12. One possibility is that the conversation he remembers having with military and police officers and/or his observation of the damage to Building 7 actually took place before he left the scene on September 11.


One can only hope that Insana clarifies his story, but the real question for Insana and CNBC is this: Who told him that Building 7 was brought down in a “controlled implosion”? And, for the countless reporters and government officials who were at Ground Zero in the hours and days after the attacks, how many of them were told that Building 7 would be demolished or had been demolished, and why have they not come forward with that information?


Sadly, it is all too likely that the same media malfeasance that has managed to suppress the truth about the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7 for 18 years will manage once again to ignore or explain away this newest revelation. But for those of us who exist in reality and care about truth, this revelation — which is merely one of countless corroborating pieces of evidence — will not be ignored or misconstrued.


The only correct way to understand this revelation is that Ron Insana — a reporter who intimately covered the events in New York City on 9/11, such that those events are seared into his mind and he received an Emmy nomination for his reporting — believes that Building 7 was brought down in a “controlled implosion,” most likely based on what he was told by authorities at the scene.

---

Help spread this news far and wide by donating to our Ron Insana video and press release. Your gift will help recoup the cost of producing the video and issuing the press release — and will enable AE911Truth to continue carrying out these projects in the future. Donate Today >

AE911Truth is grateful to our supporter who heard Ron Insana’s interview and sent it to us on September 17, 2019. The full interview can be heard on Bernie and Sid in the Morning. So far, Mr. Insana has not responded to our request for comment.

Spread this bombshell far and wide.
Donate to our Ron Insana video and press release.


DONATE NOW

Our Blueprint Newsletter archive | Subscribe for News | AboutAE911Truth
AE911Truth is a 501(c)3 educational organization. Donations are tax deductible. Learn more

Shop Our Online Store | WTC7Evaluation.org | BeyondMisinformation.org |

Ph 1-510-292-4710 | Fx 1-925-938-1489

Support us by shopping through AmazonSmile.com — a simple and automatic way for you to support your favorite charitable organization every time you shop,
at no cost to you. Learn More

© 2019 AE911truth.org All rights reserved.
2342 Shattuck Avenue, Suite 189, Berkeley, CA 94704.

Why Discussion of the Events of 9/11/2001 and the Deep State Help Develop the Antiwar Movement | Richard Krushnic

Why Discussion of the Events of 9/11/2001 and the Deep State
Help Develop the Antiwar Movement | Richard Krushnic 9/18/14, with an
Introduction by Christopher Gruener MA, LMHC
(Secretary for the Greater Boston Alliance for 9/11 Truth & Justice)


"Most folks don’t want to know the truth because it threatens their world view, their paradigm for understanding and making life bearable. They can accept that the government does things like this to other people and governments in other lands, but not that it does them here at home. Even considering the possible truth of such things creates cognitive dissonance that is very emotionally disturbing and frightening. All kinds of primitive and sophisticated psychological shenanigans are employed by the person considering such truths to deny their possibility and avoid seeing even the obvious."

 

 (Note: to "Subscribe" or "Unsubscribe" to the "9/11 Truth" mailings
send request to imagine@ourworldunited.net )

Hello Friends,

As many of you know, the 9/11 Truth Movement has been striving for many years to develop a collaborative interface with the broader Anti-War / Peace and Justice Movement.  Please take time to read Richard Krushnic’s article below and then add your voice to the ongoing conversation on this topic.

Richard is a leading activist in the 9/11 Truth Movement, with a long time commitment to effective peace and justice activism.  He has worked tirelessly for well over a decade to integrate these two arenas for maximum collaboration and impact.

Peace, Persistence and Solidarity,

Christopher

Christopher Gruener MA, LMHC

(Secretary for the Greater Boston Alliance for 9/11 Truth & Justice)

617-965-6552

www.crossroads-counseling-services.com

imagine@ourworldunited.net

chris.gruener@comcast.net

From: Richard Krushnic [mailto:rkrushnic@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 3:56 PM
To: Chris Gruener
Subject: 9/11 Truth, the Deep State and the Antiwar Movement

There has been a discussion chain on the UNAC (United National Antiwar Coalition) discussion group regarding recent possible false flag operations, such as the evidence that the downing of the airliner in Ukraine was a false flag, which Ralph Lopez carried into 9/11 Truth territory.  Ralph posted some of the controlled demolition evidence.  He received the usual negative responses from some of the leading lights in the discussion group.  He has been holding his own without meaningful support.  Only two persons sent extremely brief comments.  Most think 9/11 should not be allowed as part of the discussion.  Today I responded to the chain by posting the following.  I hope the moderator/moderators post my piece to the discussion.

Why Discussion of the Events of 9/11/2001 and the Deep State
Help Develop the Antiwar Movement | Richard Krushnic 9/18/14

Discussion of the events of 9/11/2011 are relevant to discussions of ongoing and prospective US wars, because all of US foreign policy and wars in the Middle East, Asia and Africa have been and continue to be heavily influenced by the events of 9/11.  If 9/11 was an inside job false-flag operation (an act a nation does itself and blames on another nation or group); this informs us of the extraordinary power the perpetrators have over us, and how manipulable the nation is by those planning and implementing wars.  It also means that false flag operations could be employed repeatedly and at any time in order to manipulate the public politicians into beginning new wars or extending existing ones.  

 I was involved in efforts to introduce 9/11 evidence into New England antiwar movement discussions a few years ago, and found that there was no interest  because most thought 9/11 Truth people were primarily right-wing Libertarians or Laruchites, which was neither the case then nor now.  At any rate, the message didn’t matter because of who it was assumed that the messenger was.  I think the same attitude is still at work today in antiwar circles.  I am a member of the socialist segment of the 9/11 truth movement, and would like to enter the current discussion.

It is certainly deeply meaningful that 2,500 licensed architects and engineers have signed the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth Petition stating that the government explanation of 9/11 is a conspiracy theory that flies in the face of the basic laws of physics and chemistry and is completely preposterous, and therefore an investigation independent of the government must be done.  The best single presentation of the views of this massive body of expertise is AE9/11 Truth’s DND Experts Speak Out, which has 42 experts in their fields of Firemen, Building Fire Safety, Physics, Chemistry, Architecture, Construction Engineering and Building Demolition. 

They point to Building 7 (47 stories) falling at free-fall speed; pools of molten metal underground under the twin towers for weeks at temperatures double that of the hottest airplane fuel or office fires; thermite and nanothermite residues in the cement powder distributed around lower Manhattan (incendiary and incendiary/explosive burning at 1.6 times the melting point of structural steel); near free-fall speed of the twin towers (all resistance removed below the demolition wave—only possible with controlled demolition); turning nearly a million pounds of concrete into fine powder (only possible with controlled demolition charges on a high percentage of floors); high-velocity ejection of multi-ton steel members; steel members like swiss cheese with sulfur (only possible with thermite or nanothermite); over 200 first responders experiencing and hearing numerous explosions, and many more pieces of evidence.  In the cases of many of these pieces of evidence, any one of them is sufficient to prove that the government’s version is a lie.

But we are not just talking about 9/11 here.  We are talking about the modern era of the US deep state from at least as far back as World War II to the present.  To understand the modus operandi of the deep state, its strength and its membership, we have to understand the main outline of its activities.  So permit this brief reflection:  Pearl Harbor was a partial false flag operation, because an 18-month plan dreamed up by a naval officer found its way to Roosevelt and was implemented.  The objective was to goad Japan into attacking Pearl Harbor in order to overcome opposition to entering the war—the real urgency was to enter the war against Germany.  Overwhelming evidence that this plan was carried out is presented in Day of Deceit, also written by a naval officer, Robert Stinnett.  The key players in the establishment of the CIA were aware of this, and as they organized and executed the coups in Iran in 1953, in Guatemala in 1954, the failed coup in Indonesia in 1958, and a brilliantly executed coup via electoral manipulation in the Philippines the same year, the outlines and strength of the secret deep state developed and solidified.

When JFK changed from a cold warrior to a peacemaker while in office, he quickly made enemies among the most powerful.  The mafia kicked out of Cuba wanted back in and blamed Kennedy for the failure of the CIA’s Bay of Pigs Invasion.  Kennedy refused to bomb Cuba against the wishes of the military and nearly everyone else in his cabinet, and set out to end the cold war and make peace with Russia and Cuba.  He refused to undertake another effort to unseat Sukarno in Indonesia, earning him the enmity of  Rockefeller oil interests and Texas mining interests (Freeport Sulfer, Brown & Root).  He moved to cut the domestic oil depletion allowance, making Clint Murcheson and H.L. Hunt bitter enemies, and put price controls on steel.  When he issued the secret order to pull out of Vietnam after the 1964 elections, that was the last straw.  On behalf of these multinational corporate, military and intelligence interests, and with the support of Lyndon Johnson, he was murdered by the CIA and the Secret Service.  Jim Douglass’ JFK and the Unspeakable:  Why He Died and Why it Matters is probably the best single book on the subject.  There is overwhelming evidence of this from many many excellent sources. 

The same forces executed his brother, RFK, and Martin Luther King.  While researching the Kennedys’ executions is tedious, researching MLK’s is easy—just read Act of State: the Execution of Martin Luther King, by Wiliam Pepper, attorney for the King family for a generation.  The book recounts all of the evidence, and presents the wrongful death suit 1999 trial in which 74 witnesses present overwhelming evidence.  So overwhelming that it took the jury of 6 whites and 6 blacks 59 minutes to return with a verdict finding agencies of the US government guilty of King’s murder.   

The secret FBI sector that is part of the deep state was in charge of the coverups of the state executions of the Kennedys and King.  The deep state component of the FBI has trained small groups in all major police departments to cooperate with them in this work.  The police departments of Dallas and Los Angeles played key roles in the coverups of the Kennedys’ executions; and the Police Dept. of Memphis not only played a key role in the King execution coverup, but also played a key role in his execution, including the actual shooting by the police department’s lead marksman.   The deep state role of the FBI is most present today in the creation of phony or entrapment cases against around  600 Muslims, in order to maintain the public fear regarding Muslim terrorists.  Read Rounded Up:  Artificial Terrorists and Muslim Entrapment After 9/11, by Shamshad Ahmad, PhD, or review the Tarek Mehanna case in Boston, where Tarek is serving 17 years for translating and posting some articles by Al Queda.   There are questions regarding the Boston Marathon Bombings.  For example:  why did the FBI execute the unarmed friend of The Tsarnaevs in Florida.  What about the family’s claims that the FBI continued contact with the elder brother after the initial 2012 interviews?  What about the presence of Craft International personnel and van at the finish line?  Craft contracts to train police departments regarding terrorist acts and may be part of the integration of the deep state’s secret coordination between the FBI and police departments.  There are many other questions regarding the Marathon Bombing.

If we cannot effectively question government versions in public and get media coverage for this, we are doomed to be forever manipulated by false-flag operations.  The current case in point is the downing of the passenger airliner in the Ukraine.  Surveying the information available in the mass media and the internet, there is clearly more evidence pointing to a downing of the airliner by Ukrainian forces than by the rebels in Eastern Ukraine.  Numerous witnesses have testified to the two jet fighters trailing the airliner immediately before it went down.

Some of the persons involved in 9/11 were already in high government positions by the time of the Kennedy killings or shortly thereafter, such as Rumsfeld, Cheney, Wolfowitz and others.  Everybody in the highest positions knows about all of this, and they know that the same forces are at large today, exercising power through the deep state—a network of multinational corporate interests, and key military, political, academic and intelligence players.  Obama’s team, when he came in, had discussions about what the president could do and not do to avoid assassination by the deep state.  Along with the assassinations of the Kennedys and King, and subsequently, the show went on in Vietnam, Brazil, the Dominican Republic, Chile, Argentina, etc.

Part of this has been US government regulation of and participation in the global illegal narcotics trade and frequent use of mafias to perform killings so they cannot be traced to the US government agency in charge: a deal with the mafia for the US heroin market in return for help in WWII in Italy; the Burma Golden Triangle following the Chinese Revolution; Southeast Asian trade in the Vietnam War (Opium and Politics in Southeast Asia by Alfred McCoy); shifting the heroin market to Pakistan and Afghanistan during the effort to unseat the Russians from Afghanistan.  And, of course, the simultaneous creation of Al Qaeda.  The US mafia was hired by the CIA to assassinate Castro, mafia gangs were used to do most of the half million killings in Indonesia immediately after the 1965 coup, etc.  The CIA created the gangs that introduced crack cocaine to the US as a means to fund the Contras in Nicaragua (Dark Alliance by Gary Stephan Webb), etc.

Then there is, of course, the INSTITUTIONALIZED  membership of the key owners and operators of the mass media in the deep state network.  The shining star example for 9/11 is the 2003 Popular Mechanics magazine and book that presented 11 arguments that 9/11 was a false flag operation.  This was the single most effective propaganda against 9/11 Truth ever.  The 11 arguments were all straw men.  The main body of 9/11 truth did not put forth any of these 11 arguments, but Popular Mechanics attributed them all to a unified 9/11 Truth movement.  Of course, none of the arguments that were put forth by the main body of the movement were mentioned.  Sophisticated disinformation technique is solidly institutionalized into the mass media’s deep state participation.

Now briefly back to 9/11: Zbigniew Brzezinski, in his 1997 Grand Chessboard laid out essentially the same plan as Project for a New American Century (PNAC) in 2000 (controlled by the neocons of the Bush Administration): a plan to extend US multinational corporate dominance in the Middle East and Asia for another 40 years.  Both documents clearly state that the plan couldn’t succeed without a new Pearl Harbor.  The plan required enough control over Afghanistan and Iraq, which straddle Iran, to exert enough influence on Iran (sitting on both the Persian Gulf and the Caspian Sea) to be able to play a prominent role in continuing energy development and pipelines.  The plan also requires continual weakening of Middle Eastern societies through warfare.  You can’t get Americans to go fight and die for half a century in Asia without a new Pearl Harbor.

The National Institutes for Standards and Technology (NIST) says on the first page of its 10,000 page report on the twin towers that it investigated nothing after the collapse initiated,  i.e. after the collapse began at the point of airplane entry.   That way, they don’t have to address nearly all of the points raised by the 2,500 architects and engineers who signed the AE9/11Truth petition (check out its website).  NIST didn’t investigate the possibility that preset explosives might have been involved.  Turns out that leaders of the NIST investigation were members of the team that developed nanothermite in the US Dept. of Eneregy’s weapons labs.  We haven’t been able to detect any source for nanothermite in 2001 other than Lawrence Livermore, Los Alamos, and the Naval Weapons Lab at Indian Point.  Nanothermite is so good that it can be disguised as almost anything, has three times the explosive force per unit of weight as runner up explosives, and is replacing former explosives in the US smart weapons arsenal.   See the Greater Boston Alliance for 9/11 Truth and Justice’s Nanothermite Packet.

NIST commissioned a study by Underwriters Labs to prove its hypothesis:  Planes’ impact and fires from the planes’ fuel and office furnishings dislodged insulation and heated floor trusses enough that they sagged 44 inches, shortening them enough to pull in exoskeleton members enough that they buckled, initiating the collapse.  Underwriters Labs created several 60-foot floor trusses to specification, loaded them with twin tower floor loads and cooked them for an hour at the NIST-prescribed temperature.  Nothing.  So they doubled the temperature and doubled the time.  The trusses sagged 4 inches, not 44 inches.  The test disproved NIST’s hypothesis.  You can see the test in an appendix to the NIST Report.  However, the test is not mentioned anywhere in the body of the report. 

Why does the truth about 9/11 and the history and nature of the deep state matter to the antiwar movement?  Because if we do not understand the deep state’s capabilities and propensities for false flag operations on all scales, from a single beheading to 9/11, we leave them the opportunity to use false flag operations at will to start any war any time.  If we don’t understand that every single provocation we hear about (beheadings, suicide bombings, thwarted plans by US Muslims in Albany, the airliner downing in Ukraine), might be a false flag operation; then we throw away one of our potentially greatest tools for peace:  education of masses of people about the modus operandi of the deep state.   I have no idea if the recent beheadings were false flag operations, but they might have been, and just see how a few simply executed beheadings can be enough to start a new level of conflict.  If a meaningful segment of the public is wise to the methods and omnipresence of the deep state, it would be much easier to get government versions scrutinized in the mass media, and much harder to start or extend wars.

The leading response to any attempt to present evidence regarding 9/11 as a false-flag operation is:  In an operation that complex, they wouldn’t be able to keep it a secret—somebody would talk.  Many people talked about their involvement or what they knew about the JFK and MLK executions, but not for many years after the events.  Many people talked about their involvement or what they knew about the plan to goad the Japanese into attacking Pearl Harbor, but not for many years after the events.  Perhaps many will eventually talk about 9/11.  The same is true about nearly all of the CIA coups and assassinations of heads of state.  What is much more interesting and important, however, is that even though there is incontrovertible evidence regarding the assassinations of the Kennedys and MLK and about Pearl Harbor, still, most people prefer to ignore the evidence and buy the government’s version.  Most folks don’t want to know the truth because it threatens their world view, their paradigm for understanding and making life bearable.   They can accept that the government does things like this to other people and governments in other lands, but not that it does them here at home.   Even considering the possible truth of such things creates cognitive dissonance that is very emotionally disturbing and frightening.  All kinds of primitive and sophisticated psychological shenanigans are employed by the person considering such truths to deny their possibility and avoid seeing even the obvious. 

Noam Chomsky, Michael Albert, and others, who have immeasurably benefited the antiwar movement with brilliant and endless work, have failed us on this one score.  They say that these assassinations and false-flag operations are done by small numbers of individuals or rogue elements, and that they therefore don’t matter that much; because what matters are the acts of the totalitarian institutions of the multinational corporation, and the military.  But the deep state is the network by which these corporations, the military and others discuss their long-range interests, develop their plans, and indicate how nice it would be if a group within the military or intelligence community would just kill this person or execute this false flag operation.   The deep state is fully INSTITUTIONALIZED.  The King execution involved coordination among the CIA, the FBI, the New Orleans and Memphis Mafias, the Memphis Police Department, the MIssissipi National Guard, and the US Air Force.  The Kennedys’ executions were coordinated among the CIA, the FBI, the Secret Service, the Dallas Police, the upper political establilshment in Texas, and Lyndon Johnson, with the backing of the interest groups mentioned above.  Some assassinations are done by small groups or rogue elements, but the vast majority are not, they are a major INSTITUIONAL mechanism by which many of the most pivotal events in modern history are carried out precisely at the behest of the institution of the deep state.  The coordination list for 9/11 is longer.

So please understand that people trying to educate about the events of 9/11 are not trying to divert the antiwar movement from its task of stopping or ending wars.  We are trying to broaden and deepen the analysis and understanding of the antiwar movement so that it understands its enemies better and can develop tactics and strategies to counter what may be the single most effective weapon our enemies currently possess—the false flag operation.  If you want to take a peak at one of the most recent works on the subject, go to the Coollidge Corner Branch Library at 31 Pleasant Street, Brooklline, MA Sunday September 1^st for the 1:30 showing of Anatomy of a Great Deception, a docu-thriller following a family man turned filmmaker as he unknowingly begins his own 9/11 investigation.  His belief system is shattered, he is tuned-out by his  family, his finances are collapsing, and he is compelled to try to turn it all around by making this film.

9/11: Russia Presents Evidence Against US, UK And Israel Co-Conspirators & 9/11 Was An Inside Job! "TOO CLASSIFIED TO PUBLISH" -SHIT IS HITTING THE FAN: (Is this why the stock market took a dive today?)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
9/11: Russia Presents Evidence Against US, UK And Israel
Co-Conspirators & 9/11 Was An Inside Job!
"TOO CLASSIFIED TO PUBLISH" -SHIT IS HITTING THE FAN:
(Is this why the stock market took a dive today?)
Russia Today Declares 9/11 Was An Inside Job!  +
RUSSIAN 9/11 DATA DUMP REVEALS STATE ACTORS ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Note: Thank you, David B Sky for this.  I have been a Truther since 9/11..it just didn't feel right..and it was From the Wilderness website and Michael C. Ruppert that got me thinking, before I connected with other Truthers on tribe in 2005. 

Anyone who's been a Truther long enough has heard these "theories" years ago...we knew it was nano-thermite, as in the clearly executed controlled demolition of Building 7, which wasn't hit by planes or debris.....but even COBRA has talked about space weapons technology used to strike the two towers...

...and so did Susan Lindauer, former CIA Assett to Iraq, arrested and detained for 5 years under the Patriot Act, who has since been speaking out...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-uj79SEgjQ
(listen to whole story for context but for this reference, start at 17:00:00)
"He said, "DO NOT go back to NYC. It's to dangerous. We are expecting the use of a miniature thermo-cuclear device. (And they were not afraid of falling debris at the World Trade Center, I wasn't going to be at the World Trade Center, they were afraid of radiation contamination..like the winds blowing radioactive stuff...) He was like, 'Don't go up there, we are expecting mass casualties...'" Then she talks about going to NY anyway, and her final plea to the Iraqis to come clean about the supposed "Weapons of Mass Destruction" that was later proved to be a lie.

...and now, there is PROOF!
http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/proven-9-11-nukes-us-government-involvement/

I'm going to go see what http://911blogger.com has to say about this.

Everyone, if you have not clicked the article link and read it, check it out! And connect the dots...Note that in recent months:

-We have a new stock market created to circumvent the traditional NYSE corrupted after 9/11 by High Frequency Trading..(and who was in the twin towers? Financial firms and TRADERS!)

see also  http://2012portal.blogspot.com/2014/07/fall-of-chimera.html
"..The Chimera group has hijacked the global financial system from the hands of the central bankers in the last decade through the PROMIS software and through high speed trading programs. The Resistance and the Organization (its forerunner) were aware of those programs for quite some time and were able to siphon off about 70 trillion dollars away from the black funds of the Cabal. That money will be given back to humanity after the Reset through the collateral accounts..."

-We now have a new 100% gold-backed secure monetary system created by the BRICS alliance (Brazil, Russia, India, China-with Germany, Spain and France quick to follow...) 
to circumvent the corrupt IMF, Central and World Banks, which rule US banks..

-and now we have some TRUTH coming out about WTF really happened back in 2001...
-despite months of warnings by CIA Assets and others in the know. 


--->>CONNECT THE DOTS YOU'VE BEEN IGNORING!<<---
-PB

(p.s.) Be sure to read the comments in the article, some good info and links there...at least he ones at the beginning seem free of shills and trolls.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
9/11: Russia Presents Evidence Against US, UK And Israel
Co-Conspirators & 9/11 Was An Inside Job!
"TOO CLASSIFIED TO PUBLISH" -SHIT IS HITTING THE FAN:
(Is this why the stock market took a dive today?)
Russia Today Declares 9/11 Was An Inside Job!  +
RUSSIAN 9/11 DATA DUMP REVEALS STATE ACTORS
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


“9/11 was an Anglo-American black operation executed in collusion with Israeli Secret Services.” — 9/11 Investigator

Undoubtedly the 9/11 attacks on New York City and Washington DC are the most misrepresented by officialdom in US history.

911 type of nuclear devices used on 911 were a modified version of the W-54 nuclear artillery shells that were covertly provided to the Israelis between 1988 and 1998 from US surplus stockpiles illegally exported during the Bush/Clinton era. Read more: http://www.storyleak.com/911-russia-presents-evidence-against-us-uk-and-israel-co-conspirators/#ixzz36AKhDtem


type of nuclear devices used on 911 were a modified version of the W-54 nuclear artillery shells that were covertly provided to the Israelis between 1988 and 1998 from US surplus stockpiles illegally exported during the Bush/Clinton era.
Read more: http://www.storyleak.com/911-russia-presents-evidence-against-us-uk-and-israel-co-conspirators/#ixzz36AKhDtem

Whereas the assassination of John F. Kennedy is now understood to have been a classic CIA Public Execution Plan, it does not come close to 9/11 in terms of the number and magnitude of outright falsehoods, misleading statements, fake science and fraudulent facts submitted by officials and agents of the US Government.  The ‘official’ 9/11 Commission Report stands as the most fabricated document ever produced by US tax dollars.  Not only did the investigation avoid every serious inquiry about how two steel frame building came down after being dustified in NYC, it also subverted every initiative to ferret out the truth.


That’s all about to change in 2014.

It appears that Russia has been conducting systematic data dumps on 9/11, the release of which represents more factual information on the attacks than any US Government source.  In the wake of the Anglo-American coup d’état conducted by the CIA and MI6 in Kiev, it appears that Russia has no more patience for Western interference.  Especially when nations are destabilized on Russia’s borders do the stakes in this highly consequential geopolitical chess match go up.

Since Vladimir Putin has no intention of starting World War 3, he can only respond to US-EU meddling by using asymmetric warfare on the internet.  Were the American people to understand that elements within the US Federal Government were behind the 9/11 attacks , EVERYTHING would change in a heartbeat.  Because the Obama Administration has shown no sign of aborting its planned takeover of the Ukraine, Russia is now left with fewer, but still quite potent options.

The following excerpt recently appeared on an alternative news website — Veterans Today — under the subtitle “Too Classified to Publish”.  Essentially this unprecedented release of ultra-secret and highly classified information illustrates Putin’s new tack toward Western intractability.  Simply put, Russia will no longer stand by idly while the Anglo-American Juggernaut projects it power wherever it so chooses.

"TOO CLASSIFIED TO PUBLISH"

    According to a retired FXX agent specializing in Israeli counter intel: The type of nuclear devices used on 911 were a modified version of the W-54 nuclear artillery shells that were covertly provided to the Israelis between 1988 and 1998 from US surplus stockpiles illegally exported during the Bush/Clinton era.

    Chemical analysis done by DOE Sandi was able to identify the chemical/radiation footprint or fingerprint of the warheads based on samples taken after 911 of the fallout at ground zero. (Editor’s note: Nuclear weapon use at ground zero is confirmed from multiple sources)

    All plutonium based warheads have a chemical fingerprint that can identify the type of design and where the PU was made and how old it is. This was the 911 blackmail on Bush 1 and 2, the illegal transfer of surplus US nuclear weapons to the Israelis and why the continued cover up, along with the stolen gold and stock fraud that was going on Wall Street etc. According to file ENW57.pdf on page 66. (Editor’s note: Document received and confirmed)

    Only a 2 kiloton device was needed to drop the buildings. A 2 kiloton device will produce a fireball of apx 150 to 200 feet in diameter at over 4000 degrees Centigrade. Just large enough to melt the I beams of the central core of the building and drop them in place. The light flash would last less than 1 second and primarily be in the UV light range. Overpressure would only be at 60PSI max and directed upwards with the blast. See underground effect.

    Fallout would be minimal and located to within ground zero range only. Radiation would drop to acceptable levels within 72 hrs. after the blast. Most fall out was trapped in the cement dust thus causing all of the recent cancer deaths that we are now seeing in NYC amongst first responders. (Editor’s note: Consistent with site data)

High FluxIsotope Reactor Core – Cross Section

High FluxIsotope Reactor Core – Cross Section

Melted steel and iron oxide or “nano thermite” is a byproduct of the very high gamma ray / Neutron flux induced into the central steel core. The radiation dissolves the steel into iron oxide consuming the carbon and silicone in the steel.

This explains the missing steel columns and the very important clue of the “vaporized’ 20 ton antenna tower atop the south tower. The upward blast of radiation literally vaporized it. Video evidence proves this to be true. (Editor’s note: Tower issue a vital one.)

The total XXOO data file from DOE Sandia on the 911 event is well over 72 MB. P.S. Snowden didn’t have a Q clearance so he missed this one. Carnaberry had a pretty good stash of documents on the subject. (All under the transit stuff.) The entire nuclear nonproliferation story of stolen nuclear material coming from Russia was an Israeli cover story to hide the original source of weapons material coming from the US stock piles. (Editor’s note: Fully confirmed)

Illegal distribution of US nuclear material to foreign allies was not limited to Israel. Virtually all NATO allies were in on this scam too. Dick Cheney was the bad guy on this one. Bush2/Cheney traded nuclear pits to foreign country as IOU’s in order to get what they wanted. Tom Countryman a well-known Israeli operative is curiously now in charge of N.N.P. at the State Department under Obama.(?) He was put there by Ram Emanuel.
Early Israeli core model – Vannunu photo

Early Israeli core model – Vannunu photo

It appears that the weapon of choice for the Israelis were the W-54 and follow on series of nuclear pits taken from the Amarillo TX storage dump. This was what Carnaberry was working on for Bush senior in Houston.

A total of over 350 pits were transferred to the Israelis over a 10 to 20 year period of time. The W-54 type of pit design were the most desirable due to the 2 point implosion pit design. This is the easiest to re manufacture and modify as compared to other circular pit designs.

The pill shaped design of the W-54 type weapon contains over 1.5 times more plutonium than a standard pit. This would allow enough Plutonium to be recovered that was still of weapons grade use even after 32 plus years of age. Americium build up in the pit over time eventually makes the Pit unusable as a weapon so they have a limited shelf life based on how fast or slow the Plutonium was produce in the reactor at Stanford.

Usually it was about 150 days max. Irradiation time in the reactor during production determines the shelf life of the pit as weapons grade material. All of the micro nukes used by the Israelis are re-manufactured W-54 type series devices.
bali bombs Khazelov confirmed this a micro nuke bombing

Bali bombs Khazelov confirmed this a micro nuke bombing

These devices were used in the Bali bombing and the London bombing and in Japan on their reactors. (Editor’s note: Nuclear weapon use in Bali confirmed) Also used in Damascus, Iraq and Afghanistan by the US. (Editor’s note: Multiple confirmation including site samples.)

These are stored in most Israelite embassies for ease of deployment. The one’s used on 911 were kept at the Israeli consulate in NYC until put in place. After 911 the FBI now checks all diplomatic pouches with a Geiger counter before entering or leaving the US. The South African weapons were also surplus W-54 artillery shells acquired from Israeli and final assembly and testing was done in South Africa with Israel assistance. (Editor’s note: This explains Pelendaba production issues.)

This was done because the Israelis needed a testing ground in order to make sure that there rebuilt weapons would work as designed. (Editor’s note: Testing on Sept. 22, 1979 multiple confirmations.) The North Korean weapons are also of the 155 mm artillery design as provided by Israel.

The true North Korean nuclear weapons program is based on nuclear artillery use and not missiles. The plan is to use a massive artillery barge on South Korea if war breaks out this include the use of small nuclear artillery shells to counter US tanks rockets and artillery.

The Saudi’s also have a stash of W-54′s acquired from the US under Bush2. (Editor’s note: Confirmed) The Israelis have also provided them to India, Brazil, China, Taiwan, Japan, North and South Korea etc. (Editor’s note: All but South Korea confirmed. Canada had been believed to be the source of Brazilian nuclear weapons.) Dimona is a standard 75 megawatt thermal open top reactor as used in France for their plutonium weapons production program, their version of Stanford (Editor’s note:  Probably “Hanford”).
dimona-nuclear-plant-e1400637437812

Dimona – Israel

Due to overuse as a fast breeder reactor by the Israelis, Dimona suffered a “steam explosion” IE a flash over indecent due to neutron criticality back in the late 1980′s under Bush 1. This shut down its operation for many years until repairs could be made.

It now only operates at very low power levels due to neutron absorption damage to the containment vessel. Now mainly use for isotope production. This forced the Israelis to turn to stolen nuclear stockpiles from the US for the continuation of their nuclear program.

The Israelis knowing that the nuclear material that they had acquire only had a limited shelf life left before it was no longer usable as weapons grade then tried to dump it on the surplus market as fast as possible before it was of no use to them. So they dumped it on unsuspecting nations who would only sit on it and not be able to test it. These were the fissile tests in North Korea. (Editor’s note: Confirmed, multiple sources)

When everybody caught on to the scam such as Japan and Korea. (IE the Korean sub sinkings etc) they were angry because they paid big bucks for junk. This started a mini cold war with Israel and her old clients. However with micro nukes even as the plutonium ages it will still fissile producing a smaller size detonation well under 2 kiloton in size.

So they can still be used as small dirty bombs or as very small tactical nukes such as the nuclear artillery strikes on Damascus with rocket assisted W-54′s. (Editor’s note: Confirmed strike, May 4, 2013) On the W-54 pit design it is pill shaped and it is only about 4 inches in diameter and weighs about 24 pounds.

Most of the fuel is consumed in the plasma fire ball when detonated so there is very little plutonium fallout left to escape. If it is salted with other materials the fallout can be even reduced to lower levels such as in an enhanced radiation device or the so called neutron bomb. This is what was used on 911.
Falling man – 911

Falling man – 911

The primary purpose of the nuclear weapon used on 911 was to produce a massive Gamma ray / neutron flux that would vaporize about 150 to 300 feet of 6 inch thick steel I beams that constituted the central core of the WTC buildings. This created a free fall event as seen on TV that day.

The flash would be hidden from sight due to the underground detonation. Most of the light was in the non-visible light spectrum any way. Overpressure would be reduced to 6 psi due to the blast traveling up the central core and neutron radiation vaporizing the TV antenna at the top of the building as see on TV.

The fallout would be mainly vaporized concrete cement and iron oxide. This is why after 911 they told everyone on TV that the beta radiation burns that people were getting were due to the caustic cement dust and not due to the radiation effects from the radioactive cement fallout. (Editor’s note: Fully confirmed)

The iron oxide found all over the place was what was left of the steel I beams. This was the so called Nano Thermite that was found everywhere. Fallout was limited to a 1 mile area around downtown NYC. See charts. (Editor’s note: Received)

Radiation decay was reduced to safe low levels after 72 hrs., (Editor’s note: Fully confirmed) outside of ground zero itself. This is why the area was blocked off from the public for 3 days after the event, in order to let the radiation drop to safe levels.

911 truth

911 truth

God Bless the Whistleblowers! ~ "The truth will set you free, but first it will piss you off." ~ Gloria Steinem

911blogger.com 

Paying Attention to 9/11 Related News 

http://911blogger.com/

~~~

Why Has CSPAN Been Talking About WTC7 & 9/11 So Often?
http://911blogger.com/news/2014-05-21/why-has-cspan-been-talking-about-wtc7-911-so-often

~~~

The Astounding Conspiracy Theories of Wall Street Genius Mark Gorton
http://gawker.com/the-astounding-conspiracy-theories-of-wall-street-geniu-1561427624

~~~

CIA WhistleBlower Susan Lindauer EXPOSES Everything! 'Extreme Prejudice'
http://youtu.be/NiaivgcRrhA

Former CIA Asset, Susan Lindauer, provides an extraordinary first-hand account from behind the intelligence curtain that shatters the government's lies about 9/11 and Iraq, and casts a harsh spotlight on the workings of the Patriot Act as the ideal weapon to bludgeon whistle blowers and dissidents. A terrifying true story of "black budget" betrayals and the Patriot Act, with its arsenal of secret evidence, indefinite detention and threats of forcible drugging,

EXTREME PREJUDICE (Book by Susan Lindauer) reveals one Asset's desperate struggle to survive the brutal cover ups of 9/11 and Iraq. EXTREME PREJUDICE delivers a high tension expose of the real facts surrounding the CIA's advance warnings of 9/11 and Iraq's contributions to the 9/11 investigation.

Further Review and link to the book at this Link.
http://extremeprejudiceusa.wordpress.com/

Susan's book "Extreme Prejudice" can be purchased on Amazon.
http://www.amazon.com/EXTREME-PREJUDICE-Terrifying-Story-Patriot-ebook/dp/B004HYHBK2/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1404456468&sr=8-1&keywords=susan+lindauer+extreme+prejudice

A revealing recent RT interview  with Susan Lindauer cuts to the chase:
Bush & Cheney Knew About 9/11 Months Before It Happened Says Whistleblower
Charged Under Patriot Act
http://youtu.be/GnCIVeX0Ukc
She warns Assange and Snowden in her opening remarks.

~~~

Luke Rudkowski of We Are Change interviews Rudy Dent, FDNY 9/11 Survivor
and Vietnam Vet, who witnessed the collapse of Building 7:

Luke Rudkowski interviews Rudy Dent
http://911blogger.com/news/2014-05-29/luke-rudkowski-interviews-rudy-dent

FDNY 9/11 Survivor Witness and Whistleblower: Speaks on WTC 7
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePPdUUISQOs

Published on May 25, 2014
In this video Luke Rudkowski interviews FDNY member Rudy Dent who on the day of 9/11 was witness to the collapse of infamous World Trade Center 7. Rudy Dent - Vietnam War veteran, four year member of the NYPD and thirty-two year FDNY firefighter. As a firefighter on 9/11, he was at Ground Zero and was there when Building 7 came down. In this episode of 9/11 Free Fall, he relives his experience that day, recounting how he believes the buildings in New York were brought down in controlled demolitions.


-And Richard Gage (Founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth)

Luke also interviews Richard Gage here:
http://911blogger.com/news/2014-05-29/luke-rudkowski-interviews-rudy-dent#comment-261380

on YouTube:

Architects and Engineers Respond to CNN's Jake Tapper Slander of 9/11 Truth
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNOR5FiC-7c

Richard Gage also refers to this video:

9/11: Explosive Evidence -- Experts Speak Out (Full)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stOQ5Vl9d0k
Uploaded on Sep 11, 2011
The powerful new documentary film by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
Richard Gage, AIA
http://www.ae911truth.org
special thanks to https://www.facebook.com/ae911truth


Richard Gage and Rudy Dent both responded to recent comments by the ever-controversial CNN "Journalist",  conservative Jake Tapper, for his delusional and pathetic attempt at discrediting the 911 Truth movement:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSqCgG-ecd4


We Are Change:
Like Us on Facebook: https://facebook.com/LukeWeAreChange
Follow Us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Lukewearechange
Stalk Luke on Instagram: http://instagram.com/lukewearechange

~~~

High Ranking US Major General Exposes 911 official version untrue https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0xzsbSbVUE
Gen. Stubblebine on 9/11 -"OH MY GOD!!!!"
http://youtu.be/Jc1ql4TfCZw
 Albert "Bert" N. Stubblebine III is a retired Major General in the United States Army. He was the Commanding General of the United States Army Intelligence and Security Command from 1981 to 1984, when he retired from the Army. He is also known for his interest in parapsychology.

Stubblebine graduated from the United States Military Academy and received a Master's Degree in Chemical Engineering from Columbia University.[1] His active duty career spanned 32 years, and he is credited with redesigning the U.S. Army intelligence architecture during his command of the United States Army Intelligence and Security Command from 1981 to 1984.

Other U.S. Army commands that he led included the Electronic Research and Development Command (ERADCOM) and the Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM).[2] Stubblebine was a key person in the U.S. military invasion of Grenada and was, according to a report published by the Daily Mail, "at the heart of America's military machine".[3] He is a member of the Military Intelligence Hall of Fame.[4]

Stubblebine appeared in the 2006 documentary "One Nation Under Siege"[2] in which he states, in relation to the attack on The Pentagon which took place on September 11, 2001: I look at the hole in The Pentagon, and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon, and I said "The plane does not fit in that hole. So what did hit the Pentagon?"


~~~

Tomgram: Peter Van Buren, What We've Lost Since 9/11 (Part 2)
Posted by Peter Van Buren    at 8:00am, June 26, 2014.
Follow TomDispatch on Twitter @TomDispatch.
http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175861/tomgram%3A_peter_van_buren%2C_what_we%27ve_lost_since_9_11_%28part_2%29/


Tomgram: Peter Van Buren, RIP, The Bill of Rights
Posted by Peter Van Buren    at 6:26pm, June 15, 2014.
Follow TomDispatch on Twitter @TomDispatch.
http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175856/tomgram:_peter_van_buren,_rip,_the_bill_of_rights/
~~~

9/11 Consensus Panel Releases New Evidence from Witness Testimonies and Architectural Drawings
Posted by Orangutan. on Mon, 06/02/2014 - 3:19pm
http://911blogger.com/news/2014-06-02/911-consensus-panel-releases-new-evidence-witness-testimonies-and-architectural-drawings
    9/11 Consensus Panel
    David Ray Griffin

PRESS RELEASE:  World Trade Center Building 7’s Controlled Demolition: 9/11 Consensus Panel Releases New Evidence from Witness Testimonies and Architectural Drawings

June 1, 2014 –The 24-member 9/11 Consensus Panel – which includes physicists, chemists, engineers, commercial pilots, attorneys and lawyers – today announced three new studies confirming the controlled demolition of World Trade Center 7.

The studies scientifically refutes the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) claim that, for the first time in history, fire caused the sudden and complete collapse of a large, fire-protected, steel-framed building on 9/11.

(Note that whereas the Consensus Panel uses a scientific methodology to peer-review its work, the NIST report was not peer-reviewed.)

The first Panel study deals with the NIST computer simulations, which purported to show that fire-induced thermal expansion caused a girder to be pushed off its seat at Column 79, thereby initiating a global collapse of the entire 47-storey building at 5:21 in the afternoon.

However, a recent FOIA request has produced WTC 7 architectural drawings showing that the NIST simulations omitted basic structural supports that would have made this girder failure impossible.

The second Consensus Panel study deals with NIST’s claim that it did not recover any steel from this massive steel-frame skyscraper.

This is extraordinary, given the need to understand why a steel-frame building would have completely collapsed for the first time in history from fire alone, and to thereby prevent a recurrence.

We know now that some of the steel was recovered.  Photographs recently obtained by researchers show the strange curled-up paper-thin WTC 7 steel, with a NIST investigator pointing it out.

The third Panel study shows that on September 11, 2001, many people were told hours in advance that WTC 7 was going to collapse.

MSNBC reporter Ashleigh Banfield said early in the afternoon: "I’ve heard several reports from several different officers now that that is the building that is going to go down next.”

Many members of the New York Fire Department were confidently waiting for the building to come down:

    Firefighter Thomas Donato: "We were standing, waiting for seven to come down. We were there for quite a while, a couple hours.”

    Assistant Commissioner James Drury: "I must have lingered there. There were hundreds of firefighters waiting to -- they were waiting for 7 World Trade Center to come down.”

    Chief Thomas McCarthy: “So when I get to the command post, they just had a flood of guys standing there. They were just waiting for 7 to come down.”

In addition, CNN and the BBC made premature announcements.

This foreknowledge corroborates the evidence presented in previous Consensus Points (WTC7-1 to WTC7-5) that WTC 7 was brought down by controlled demolition.

Source:            The 9/11 Consensus Panel   @911consensus  consensus911@gmail.com
Contact List:    http://www.consensus911.org/media-contacts/
Co-founders:    David Ray Griffin, Elizabeth Woodworth

~~~

WE DID IT! 67,192 signatures submitted
to the City of New York
http://911blogger.com/news/2014-07-04/we-did-it-67192-signatures-submitted-city-new-york

Representatives of the High-Rise Safety Initiative stand in front of the City Clerk's office on July 3, 2014 before submitting 67,192 signatures. Left to right: Ted Walter, NYC CAN Executive Director; Valerie Lucznikowska, Aunt of Adam Arias; Bob McIlvaine, Father of Bobby McIlvaine.

67,192 Signatures Submitted

We are proud to announce that earlier today we submitted over 67,000 signatures to the City of New York - 37,000 more than the requisite number for a charter amendment to be submitted to the voters at this November's election. If passed by voters on November 4th, it would require the City's Department of Buildings to investigate the collapse of WTC 7 and any future high-rise collapses. We would like to extend our deepest gratitude to everyone who contributed blood, sweat, tears and hard-earned dollars toward this remarkable achievement.

Together we did it!

    2 comments
    Read more

Posted by Orangutan. on Sun, 06/29/2014 - 8:46am

...and on, and on...

<3 May Truth Come to Light, and set us all FREE! >